At a glance: Measure the incremental lift generated by retargeting campaigns.
Related reading: Running an Incrementality experiment | Audiences | Incrementality blog |
What is Incrementality?
Probably the best way to understand incrementality analysis is through an example:
Say you recently ran a remarketing campaign. For the sake of simplicity, we'll say it was with only one ad network. The campaign's conversion rate was 5%.
Now you want to evaluate the success of the campaign, and you need to answer important (and, of course, the most difficult) questions:
- Is 5% a good conversion rate for this campaign?
- How do we know that the campaign truly resulted in driving additional conversions?
- Was the campaign worth the cost of running it?
In order to answer these questions accurately and without bias, we must consider more than just measured conversions. We must take into account the number of users who would have converted organically, even if they had never engaged with a remarketing campaign.
This difference between total conversions and those that would have happened anyway is known as incremental lift (or sometimes simply "lift"), and it is critical to determining the true value of a campaign. It can be quite difficult to measure, but that is precisely what AppsFlyer Incrementality is designed to do.
Incrementality overcomes the challenge of measuring incremental lift by allowing you to create scientifically valid experiments to compare the behavior of similar groups. These groups vary only in that some groups (the "test groups") are exposed to your campaign, and one group (the "control group") is not.
Learn more about creating and running Incrementality experiments
The following sections explain the calculations behind the numbers reported on the Incrementality dashboard.
AppsFlyer Incrementality employs 2 alternative methods for calculating lift:
While reach-based methodology is preferable for purposes of evaluating campaign performance, its calculation requires the measurement of data points not provided by all ad networks. For these networks, intent-to-treat methodology is used instead.
Prior to December 16, 2021, lift was calculated using solely the intent-to-treat method. However, data for earlier dates has been updated to utilize reach-based lift where applicable. Therefore, you can review historical experiments to analyze their results in light of the new methodology.
Intent-to-treat (ITT) experimental methodology has its foundations in medical science. Using ITT, researchers randomly split a given population between a control group who are not treated and a test group whom researchers intend to treat. Researchers measure the efficacy of a given treatment by comparing the results of the groups. Whether or not a test group member actually received treatment is not taken into account.
Similarly, in remarketing, the lift metric measures campaign efficacy. It doesn't matter if a user in the test group actually engaged with a campaign (received treatment) because it is the intent that is relevant in calculating incrementality. In other words, results are calculated as if every member of the test group actually engaged with the campaign.
When is it used?
AppsFlyer Incrementality uses ITT-based lift calculation for SRNs.
Although it is not the preferred method for measuring lift in our context, ITT remains a scientifically sound experimental method, and it provides valid results when reach-based calculation is not possible.
The underlying assumption that all members of the test group were actually reached by a campaign often results in low conversion rates and, as a consequence, low incremental lift.
As its name implies, reach-based lift calculation takes into account whether or not a member of the test group was actually reached (served a campaign ad) prior to converting. In addition to requiring additional data, reach-based lift calculation is also more complex in that it requires certain mathematical adjustments to the control group in order to be statistically valid. These adjustments are cumulatively known as the creation of a "counterfactual" control group.
When is it used?
AppsFlyer Incrementality uses reach-based lift calculation for non-SRNs (attribution-link networks).
While it is the preferred method for calculating lift, reach-based calculation requires that ad networks report the following data to AppsFlyer:
- Impression data
- Campaign ID (from the attribution link)
If this data is not reported, incrementality measurement is not available (and displays as N/A on the Incrementality dashboard).
Since reach-based lift calculation takes into account only test group members that were actually reached by a campaign, networks that are measured using reach-based incrementality will usually show amplified results (positive lift will become much higher, and negative lift will become much lower).
Because the 2 different lift calculation methodologies can yield significantly different results, the following best practices are recommended in order to make interpretation more meaningful:
When creating your experiments, select audiences that are split only among a control group and one or more networks of the same type, either:
- Attribution-link networks (non-SRNs) for reach-based calculation; or
- SRNs for ITT-based calculation
- In your initial experiments, consider using an audience split only between a single network and a control group. This makes it less likely that comparisons will be made among 2 or more networks for which different lift calculations are used.
When evaluating the validity of Incrementality experiments, sound scientific methodology requires that we consider statistical significance (the level of confidence that the lift result isn't due to random events or chance).
On the Incrementality dashboard, significance is reported as a percentage for each media source:
- The percentage indicates the likelihood that the results for that media source would repeat themselves if the experiment were performed again under similar circumstances.
- If statistical significance is determined to be below 60%, the dashboard will display Unreliable results instead of a percentage.
- Significance is affected by audience size, experiment duration, and media source performance.
Scaled control group
Assume the following scenario:
- Test group size for Network A = 100 members
- Control group size = 90 members
- Experiment results:
- Network A had 40 conversions
- The control group had 20 conversions
- Total conversions will be adjusted based on an assumed (scaled) control group size of 100 members:
Assumed members - Actual members = 100 - 90 = 11%
Actual members 90
- Actual incremental conversions + 11% = 20 x 1.11 = 22
- Assumed members - Actual members = 100 - 90 = 11%
Lift will be calculated based on a scaled control group size of 100 members and 22 incremental conversions.
Accessing the dashboard
To access the Incrementality dashboard:
- In AppsFlyer, go to Dashboards > Incrementality.
- From the experiments list, click the row of the experiment for which you want to see the dashboard.
A tour of the dashboard
Measure: Select the metric you want to view in the dashboard:
Your selection in the Measure filter determines which metrics are displayed throughout the dashboard.
Event: Select the in-app event for which you want to view data in the dashboard.
Media source: Filter the dashboard display by one or more media sources tested in the experiment.
Date range: Filter the incremental analysis of the audience according to the selected date range.
Sums up the whole experiment with quick, at-a-glance results.
|Significance tile||Displays the statistical significance of the results shown in the dashboard|
|Headline metric tile||
The metric displayed is controlled by your selection in the Measure filter, as shown below.
Note: Calculation of metrics displayed in the headline tile require cost data. Therefore, these metrics are available only to ROI360 subscribers. If the required cost and/or revenue data is not available for this or any other reason, the relevant metric will display as N/A.
|Target size and reach tile||
Target size: The number of distinct users, for each media source, who were added to the audience for the first time during the experiment's date range
Reach: The percentage of the target that actually saw an ad from the relevant media source's campaign
|Test-group-level lift tile||
Displays total incremental metric and lift for the test group (by media source):
|Per-user lift tile||
Displays incremental metric and lift per user (by media source):
Displays the selected per-user incremental metric/lift over the date range of the experiment:
|Trend chart view controls||
Use the view controls to select options for Trend chart display and download:
Use the Export button to download the data as a table in CSV format.
Raw data reports
Use Incrementality raw data reports to analyze the interaction of users with remarketing campaigns:
- Contents: Row-level data of users included in Incrementality experiments.
- Via Data Locker
- Data freshness: daily 19:00-23:00 UTC
Download example Incrementality raw data files
Data Locker folder
Organic in-app events
In-app events non-organic
In-app events re-attributions
The basic logic underlying report structure is as follows:
Users participating in the experiment—First-seen report
- In Audiences, rules are set characterizing users to include in the experiment.
- When a given user, is identified as matching the rules, the event is recorded in the first_seen report.
- Users are allocated randomly to a test or control group indicated by the is_control_group field.
- Users in the test group are allocated to a media source (pid_destination) for retargeting.
User engagement within the app: User engagement with the app during the experiment is recorded in context-specific reports:
- Engagement type: Session or in-app event
- User attribution status when the user is first-seen: Organic, non-organic, re-attribution. For example, in the past, a user installed the app and was attributed to organic. As such, during an experiment, the attribution status is organic.
- Uninstalls: Users uninstalling the app during the experiment. Uninstall measurement must be active.
Data characteristics and fields
Field availability varies according to report type as indicated below:
Fields unique to Incrementality (per report type)
|Field||Description||First seen||In-app events||Sessions||Uninstalls|
|is_control_group||If true, the user is part of the control group||Y||Y||Y||Y|
|pid_destination||The media source the user is sent to||Y||Y||Y||Y|
|joined_audience_date||Date user first joined the audience||Y||Y||Y||Y|
|audience_name||Audience name (not unique)||Y||Y||Y||Y|
|tm||Hour of day||Y||Y||Y|
|timestamp||Event time stamp YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM||Y||Y|
|app_ids||App ids associated with the audience rules||Y|
Other Incrementality report fields (per report type)
|Field||Display name*||First seen||In-app events||Sessions||Uninstalls|
|advertising_id||Advertising ID (GAID)||Y||Y||Y||Y|
|customer_user_id||Customer user ID||Y||Y|
|event_revenue_currency||Event revenue currency||Y|
|event_revenue_u_s_d||Event revenue USD||Y|
|is_purchase_validated||Is receipt validated||Y|
|* According to raw data specification|
Incrementality specifications and limitations
|Ad network access||Not available|
|Agency access||Not available|
Dashboard: daily at 18:00 UTC for the previous day
Raw data reports in Data Locker: daily at 19:00-23:00 for the previous day
|Account user access||Yes (according to account permissions)|